The Erotic Writer

Four writers for the price of one blog

a table-like shape?

westworld“This documents serves to inform you that this project will require you to be fully nude and/or witness others fully nude and participate in graphic sexual situations (…) By accepting this Project assignment you may be required to do any of the following: appear fully nude; wear a pubic hair patch; perform genital-to-genital touching; have your genitals painted; simulate oral sex with hand-to-genital touching; contort to form a table-like shape while being fully nude; pose on all fours while others who are fully nude ride on your back; [and] ride on someone’s back while you are both fully nude.”

  • Pure erotica from a consent form signed by Hollywood extras involved in the new HBO Westworld series. If this was an effort to cull free advertising, it worked. Now I’m wishing I had a subscription to HBO. But even more than that, lawyers writing erotica? Can anyone tell me what this means: “contort to form a table-like shape while being fully nude”. Is this some new fetish I don’t know about?—or lawyer-speak for doggy-style? And here I thought I’d read everything… And what’s a pubic hair patch?  The reality is probably dull and embarrassing, but HBO could probably work up a pretty hot series based on the life of Hollywood extras—no doubt portrayed by Hollywood stars. Irony anyone?

17 comments on “a table-like shape?

  1. joebondibeachb
    October 3, 2015

    “And what’s a pubic hair patch?”

    Probably reflects current fashion to shave everything, evidently a look not desired for some scenes. No idea why women and men find the bare look attractive, but then I don’t get tattoos, either. I admit it.

    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      Actually, I like the look, and for the same reasons that classical sculptors (the Greeks and Romans) never put hair on their marble pussies — because the shape of a woman’s body is beautiful and especially so when visible. You can see where all those lovely curves terminate in that wonderful, little, dividing slip and invitation between the thighs. And the same goes for a man’s cock and balls. Arousing and beautiful without the hair (though, sadly for me, only insofar as I imagine it in the company of, or inside of, a woman’s anatomy).

    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      By the way, Joe, are you as flummoxed by a “table-like shape” as I am? The only thing that occurs to me is this (and a close-up), or this, or perhaps this? I’m leaning toward the first option. For lack of a better term (maybe the lawyers couldn’t bother googling?) the pose is called “The Crow“. And since I was googling ‘human furniture’, I want this for my birthday.

  2. joebondibeach
    October 3, 2015

    Hmm. Yes, the David is without hair and he looks fine (and let’s not go anywhere near the idea of The Donald without hair), but in my quick search I could not turn up a classical-era nude marble *with* cleft—with a mound that might reflect pubic hair or not, but no cleft.

    As for the table, I thought the same thing as you, the first item, although I didn’t add the ball gag and I think the figure needs to be straighter. I know I’ve seen it, in a non-porn setting, but couldn’t turn one up. Ah, for the days of Yul Brynner! Bet he couldn’t do the table, though.

    I’ll pass the human furniture idea on to the guy down the street who has a life-size male nude carved from a huge tree trunk, in his driveway.

    • joebondibeach
      October 3, 2015

      Oops, correction! Take another look at the David. That appears to be a clump of pubic hair, or a very bad skin condition. He still looks good.

    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      Yes, but David isn’t Roman or Greek. That’s Michelangelo — the age of fig leaves for the most part. :-)

    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      //I could not turn up a classical-era nude marble *with* cleft//

      My comment conflated the hairless women of classical sculptures with my own enjoyment of the little cleft — so visible without hair. I didn’t mean to give the impression that classical statues of women always revealed that little nook. But consider this:

      This comes from classical Greece. Consider the frescos of Pompei. To my knowledge, no hair and some pretty explicit stuff. It’s possible that there’s a statue with that divine cleft, but if so it was either destroyed or hasn’t been dug up yet. This one comes very close.

    • joebondibeach
      October 3, 2015

      Very nice, both of them.

    • joebondibeach
      October 3, 2015

      Just took a closer look. Make that very very nice to the first one!

    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      Yeah, kind of amazing isn’t it? Our taste for the erotic, what we love in each other, really hasn’t changed for thousands of years. I mean, here we are, and in all likelihood their descendants.

    • joebondibeach
      October 3, 2015

      Come to think of it, she does look a little like my grandmother, in her younger days…

  3. joebondibeach
    October 3, 2015

    OK, fair enough. (And the hell with fig leaves, generally.) But here’s Greek c. 340 BC, with hair:

    and Aphrodite, same era—no hair, but no cleft, either:

    Anyway, I take your point and agree that the classical look is, well, classical. The little-girl look on actual living grown women still doesn’t do much for me.


    • willcrimson
      October 3, 2015

      After closely examining Perseus (and his grievous injury) I’m not seeing the hair.And, you know, looking at Aphrodite, the goddess of love(making) after all, I do — I swear — see a very suggestive indentation. I mean, if we’re splitting hairs [cough]. :-)

    • joebondibeach
      October 3, 2015

      Indeed. Bless ’em all, male and female.

  4. vanillamom
    October 3, 2015

    The post post convo was as interesting as the post itself. :D LOVED what you want for your birthday…practical and beautiful, too.


    • willcrimson
      October 4, 2015

      Isn’t it? I could keep a little plush tentacle right under her breast — where her heart would be.

  5. Liras
    October 11, 2015

    Lots of irony. Loads and loads. (Which a table-like shape is obviously good for–receiving lots of loads.)

Share your thoughts.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on October 3, 2015 by in Miscellaneous, News - Sex & Erotic, RedBud, Uncategorized and tagged , .

Books & E-Books


Erotic Anthology

Arm in Arm in Arm

Search by Category

October 2015
« Sep   Nov »

Crimsonian & Obsidian Lens

The Obsidian Lens and Crimsonian contain links to password-protected stories from the Erotic Writers with darker themes. For more information on Obsidian Lens, click here. Email William Crimson directly for admission to the Crimsonian.

Adult Content

This blog contains adult material. If you are a minor, please go. If you are an adult, you are welcome to stay but be warned, this blog contains erotic fiction and images - sexually explicit content abounds. The themes sometimes tend toward the darker and weirder corners. Be your own judge when deciding what to read.

The rights to all stories by William Crimson are reserved by William Crimson. The rights to all stories by Monocle are reserved by Monocle. The rights to all stories by Ximena are reserved by Ximena.

%d bloggers like this: